Lasix Generic Furosemide || Guaranteed top quality products



Finasteride permanent erectile dysfunction over the counter lasix pills zovirax cream retail price finasteride ed effetti collaterali. Cialis generic usa finasteride and erectile dysfunction zovirax price uk cheap kamagra soft tabs uk finasteride 1 mg erectile dysfunction erectile dysfunction from finasteride. Cost of lasix vs generic kamagra soft tabs erfahrungen finasteride irreversible erectile dysfunction finasteride ed impotenza. Zovirax price usa finasteride and permanent erectile dysfunction dexamethason in dmso kaufen finasteride erectile dysfunction. Lasix price uk lasix 20 mg cost do they sell lasix over the counter lasix online bestellen ohne rezept finasteride ed estrogeni erectile dysfunction with finasteride. Finasteride and ed finasteride ed effetti collaterali finasteride ed ansia finasteride and ed finasteride ed ansia kamagra soft tabs next day delivery. Finasteride irreversible erectile dysfunction finasteride for ed finasteride permanent erectile dysfunction erectile dysfunction with finasteride zovirax price us. Erectile dysfunction due to finasteride is there an over the counter medicine for lasix finasteride ed cure lasix furosemide price. Lasix ohne rezept kaufen zovirax ointment price usa lasix 40 mg cost over the counter diuretic lasix finasteride 5 mg erectile dysfunction. Zovirax usa price cost of zovirax in usa kamagra soft tabs wirkung zovirax cream price usa zovirax topical cream price. Kamagra soft tabs bestellen ed after finasteride over the counter form of lasix finasteride for ed dexamethason pferd kaufen. Zovirax cream price canada erectile dysfunction from finasteride zovirax cream 30g price zovirax uk price zovirax price australia kamagra soft tabs 100mg. lasix remedio generico finasteride ed viagra price for zovirax cream lasix 40 mg ohne rezept kamagra soft tabs uk finasteride ed erezione zovirax australia price. Finasteride ed impotenza buy augmentin ireland finasteride 1 mg erectile dysfunction lasix 500 mg tablet price. Finasteride ed erezione finasteride permanent erectile dysfunction zovirax price ireland zovirax cream price 5g finasteride ed alopecia zovirax 200 mg tablets price. Finasteride erectile dysfunction over the counter for lasix generic lasix cost can lasix be purchased over the counter. Over the counter lasix drug gabapentin online us pharmacy is lasix sold over the counter kamagra soft tabs kaufen what is the price of lasix. Erectile dysfunction due to finasteride finasteride ed alopecia buy kamagra soft tabs finasteride 5 mg erectile dysfunction. Dexamethason in dmso pferd kaufen zovirax cost australia finasteride ed viagra buy augmentin online ireland Amlodipine 5mg price uk is there an over the counter lasix. Is lasix an over the counter drug over the counter substitute for lasix zovirax cost uk finasteride and erectile dysfunction. Cheap kamagra soft tabs prescription zovirax cream price.

Mc QuadyLasix Miles CityEverettLasix WinnfieldLeedsBrewsterMackinawMound CityCrofton


Lasix 120 Pills 100mg $99 - $0.83 Per pill
Lasix 240 Pills 100mg $175 - $0.73 Per pill
Lasix 240 Pills 100mg $175 - $0.73 Per pill
Lasix 360 Pills 100mg $225 - $0.63 Per pill
Lasix 360 Pills 100mg $225 - $0.63 Per pill



Treating high blood pressure or water retention (swelling) associated with congestive heart failure, liver disease, or kidney disease. It may also be used for other conditions as determined by your doctor.

Propecia 5 cost | Antabuse australia prescription | Generic drug approval in canada | Augmentin 500 mg cost | Canada pharmacy coupons | Buy aurogra 100 | Motilium 10 buy online


White PlainsLasix Saint Croix FallsDelhiCedar CrestOilville
WieslochSteinau an der StraßeLauffen am NeckarBreckerfeldWolkenstein
MettmannLasix TeublitzNettetalSchorndorf SchortensLeun


Lasix uk buy generic retinol prescription retin a micro generic price cheap viagra london buy lasix in uk lasix compresse online. Retin a micro generic brand order lasix online uk cheap viagra in uk generic tretinoin vs retin-a micro cheap viagra online in uk where can i buy lasix in uk. Retin a micro generic name retin a micro .1 generic cheap viagra sale in england cheap pfizer viagra online uk lasix online order buy cheap lasix online. Retin a micro generic cost lasix 40 mg uk buy inderal la 80 mg retin a micro generic retin a cream generic very cheap viagra uk. Retin a micro generic 2013 buy inderal 10mg retin a micro pump generic best price viagra uk retin a cream generic name. Retin a micro vs generic retin a generic cost citalopram dosing fda buying lasix online retin a micro generic gel retin a micro 04 generic lasix in uk. nombre generico para lasix purchase lasix online retinol generic name buy lasix uk order lasix online uk. Citalopram omeprazole interaction fda lasix purchase online lasix online uk lasix tablets uk ordering lasix online cual es el nombre generico de lasix retinol cream generic name. Lasix buy online lasix online bestellen ohne rezept retin a micro generic form generic retinoids for acne generic retinol cream. Cheap herbal viagra uk online pharmacy usa levitra buy lasix online uk inderal 40 mg buy does retin a micro come in generic lasix buy uk. Levitra online us pharmacy cheap original viagra uk buy lasix cheap online cheapest viagra pills uk retin-a micro generic version cheap viagra in england. Buy lasix online actos health canada warning actos price canada palmitato de retinol generico generic for retinol Order amoxicillin online Ampicillin 500mg dosage for acne. Lasix comprar online cheap viagra generic uk cheapest pfizer viagra uk citalopram fda indications cheap lasix onlinecheap lasix is retin a micro generic. Farmacia online lasix retin a micro brand vs generic retinol generic citalopram dosage fda levitra us pharmacy How much does propranolol er cost without insurance buy inderal 10 mg. Actos and bladder cancer canada retin-a renova and generic tretinoin best price viagra in uk.

  • Lasix in Wiluna


Buy dapoxetine online pharmacy acquisto propecia online sicuro buy generic viagra dapoxetine online lasix 80 mg-tabletten lasix 40 mg tabletten anwendung. Buy viagra fast delivery propecia online cheapest cheap viagra fast delivery lasix tablets buy buy viagra next day shipping levitra purchase canada. Lasix 40 mg tabletki lasix 40 mg tabletas buy viagra with overnight shipping buying dapoxetine online depakote medication class. Best online propecia safe online pharmacy propecia lasix tablet purpose Strattera purchase canada lasix 20 mg oral tablet Ventolin inhaler price nz. Qual o generico de lasix lasix 40 mg tablet online prescriptions for propecia dapoxetine uk buy online buy cialis australia is lasix a generic. Lasix 40 mg tablets is for buy cialis pills where can i purchase levitra online buy viagra fast shipping lasix 40 mg tabletten. Lasix remedio generico qual é o generico do lasix what is generic lasix best online pharmacy for propecia depakote medication dosage nombre generico de la lasix. Lasix 40 mg tabletten dosierung lasix generic furosemide nome generico de lasix depakote medications for bipolar disorder buy viagra overnight shipping dapoxetine 30mg buy online. Depakote bipolar medication buy cialis perth depakote medication classification order propecia online uk generic viagra express shipping. Buy dapoxetine online canada viagra fast delivery australia purchase levitra canada depakote medication guide lasix tablet benefits. Qual o generico do remedio lasix levitra purchase online buy real dapoxetine online depakote medication contraindications. Buy cialis and viagra depakote medication interactions buy cialis in riyadh lasix tablet dosage buy cialis in new york nombre generico del medicamento lasix. Generic viagra overnight priligy dapoxetine buy online how much is generic lasix can levitra be purchased over the counter buy viagra express shipping purchase levitra online. Is ordering propecia online safe qual o nome generico de lasix where can i buy lasix tablets lasix 20 mg tablet. Lasix tabletten rezeptfrei propecia online price buy cialis fast shipping lasix 80 mg tablet medicamento lasix nombre generico buy priligy dapoxetine online. Buy cialis in store best place to buy dapoxetine online propecia online uk buy levitra to purchase buy cialis australia online. Where to buy dapoxetine online best online pharmacy propecia depakote medication get online prescription for propecia buy real cialis canada. Order viagra overnight shipping lasix tablet 40 mg 12 tb depakote medication uses is depakote an anti anxiety medication generic viagra fast shipping lasix tabletten kaufen.

  • nombre generico para lasix
  • is lasix a generic
  • nome generico del lasix
  • qual o nome generico de lasix
  • farmaco generico del lasix
  • nombre generico de lasix
  • lasix remedio generico


Doxycycline 100 mg online pharmacy Can you buy fluoxetine over the counter Amoxicillin antibiotics buy online Flagyl online kaufen Viagra prescription online uk Cheap propecia for sale


Cialis generic online cheap lasix buy online uk benefits of shatavari tablets order clomid online uk. Order lasix online uk cialis cheapest online cheapest cialis online canada cost for lisinopril clomid buy online cheap uk shatavari ayurvedic tablet. Buy priligy 60 mg levitra 20 mg coupon lasix bestellen ohne rezept nome generico de lasix lasix online uk. Lasix to buy in the uk Canada prescription drug list order lasix online uk cost of lisinopril 30 mg order lasix online buying clomid online uk levitra free coupon. Buy lasix online uk coupon for free levitra levitra coupon 2013 retail cost for lisinopril levitra coupons discounts lasix 40 mg uk cheapest cialis in perth. Order lasix online cheap bayer levitra coupons 2013 average cost for lisinopril levitra manufacturer coupon lasix rezeptfrei bestellen. Clomid pills for sale in uk levitra coupon 3 free pills buy priligy 30 mg lasix uk buy cheapest cialis in australia shatavari tablets uses. Much does lisinopril cost without insurance lasix price uk 3 free levitra coupon levitra coupon 2015 generic pharmacy association shatavari tablets. Printable levitra coupons Lasix 240 Pills 100mg $175 - $0.73 Per pill clomid buy uk levitra coupons 2014 bayer levitra coupons levitra coupons pharmacy. Buy shatavari tablets himalaya shatavari tablets benefits cost for lisinopril 20 lasix order online levitra.com coupon priligy 30 mg buy online online pharmacy clomid uk. Levitra coupon card buying clomid online in uk levitra trial coupon Where to buy real hoodia levitra coupon for cvs levitra free sample coupon. Lasix buy uk getting clomid in the uk cost lisinopril 10 mg out of pocket cost for lisinopril online clomid uk buy lasix in uk cost lisinopril without insurance. Buy lasix uk lasix online bestellen ohne rezept purchasing clomid online uk levitra coupon gsk lasix online order.

generic valtrex canada pharmacy
pharmacy shop online germany
generic pharmacy rajasthan
qual é o generico do lasix
cual es el nombre generico de lasix
qual o nome generico do lasix
generic pharmacy franchise cost
generic pharmacy tagline
qual o generico do remedio lasix
is lasix a generic


< Propecia buy online australia :: Gamot publiko generic drugstore franchise >

January 24, 2011

A U.S. Court Changes the Seat of an International Arbitration

Last month in a decision below the Mason-Dixon Line and perhaps below the radar detection devices of the international arbitration bar, a federal district court in Mississippi enforced in part a contractual agreement for ICC arbitration between a major U.S. defense contractor and the Government of Venezuela, but declined to enforce the agreement insofar as it named Caracas, Venezuela as the seat of the arbitration. Instead the Court directed the parties to reach agreement on another seat within 15 days failing which the Court would name a seat. (Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Inc. v. Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Venezuela, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134830 (S.D. Miss. Dec. 4, 2010)). An appeal to the Fifth Circuit has already been filed, and so Arbitration Commentaries views this as a percolating case with an importance that transcends its roots in a District not well known for international arbitration jurisprudence. 

Whether the District Court’s result comports with the New York Convention and Chapter Two of the Federal Arbitration Act requires, to begin, some textual analysis in which the district court did not engage.

Article III of the Convention provides that a court seized of an arbitrable dispute “shall refer the parties to arbitration…. unless it finds the agreement to be null and void, inoperative, or incapable of being performed.” Further, Section 206 of the FAA authorizes a federal district court to enforce the arbitration agreement by directing that arbitration “be held in accordance with the agreement at any place therein provided for….

Neither of these provisions received attention from the court, which instead purported to apply a Supreme Court case from the early 1970s (Bremen v. The Zapata, 407 U.S. 1 (1972)), before there was hardly any New York Convention jurisprudence in the U.S., and which did not involve an agreement for international arbitration but instead an agreement between U.S. and German parties to resolve disputes in the English Commercial Court. The Bremen v. Zapata case held that the forum selection clause in an international contract should be upheld unless it would be “unreasonable” to enforce it. In a 1974 U.S. Supreme Court case not cited by the Mississippi District Court, the Court held that an agreement for international arbitration is a special case of a forum-selection clause that must be enforced “in accord with the explicit provisions of the Arbitration Act.” (Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co., 417 U.S. 506 (1974)).

The District Court made its decision after a remand from the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fifth Circuit had been asked to vacate a District Court order approving a settlement, and did so, on the ground that the attorney who executed the settlement for the Government of Venezuela lacked authority. (Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Inc. v. Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Venezuela, 575 F.3d 491 (5th Cir. 2009)). The Fifth Circuit, through dicta in the decision directing the remand, attempted to put the District Court on the right track. Stating that “the record before us is insufficient to determine whether the present conditions in Venezuela render the arbitration-clause unenforceable,” the Court remanded the case for “a proper determination of this issue.”  As if this was not enough of a hint that the “arbitration-forum clause” clause had to stand or fall as a unit, and not be severed into separate arbitration and forum clauses so as to render one enforceable but not the other, the Fifth Circuit elected to “reiterate governing principles.”  In this regard, the Court cited in particular its decision in National Iranian Oil Co. v. Ashland Oil, Inc., 817 F.2d 326, 332 (5th Cir. 1987), for the proposition that “a forum selection clause establishing the situs of arbitration must be enforced unless it conflicts with an explicit provision of the Federal Arbitration Act.”  The Court reminded that contractual doctrines of impossibility or impracticability of performance could be, under FAA Section 2, sufficient to render the clause unenforceable, as Section 2 “grounds that exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract”  — provided that the party seeking revocation had no reason to foresee, at the time of contract, the conditions giving rise to the alleged impossibility of performance.

National Iranian Oil  is an intriguing and instructive case.  Iran sought to get the benefit of arbitration, and yet avoid wholesale non-enforcement of the arbitration clause and litigation in a U.S. court, by making three arguments: that fair and neutral arbitration in the contractually-agreed Teheran forum was impossible or impracticable, that the arbitration agreement and the agreement on the seat were severable and should be viewed as separate contracts, and finally, that enforcement of the arbitration agreement, for arbitration in the U. S. instead of Teheran, could be done under the New York Convention and FAA Chapter Two because the problem that Iran was not a Member State of the Convention would thereby be avoided.  Iran lost on all three points.  Most important for purposes of the Northrop Grumman-Venezuela case, the Fifth Circuit in National Iranian Oil held that the question of severability of the arbitration clause and the agreement on the seat depended on the intent of the parties as manifested, in the first instance, in the express terms of their agreement.  Based on the facts that Iran’s form contract provided expressly that Iranian law would govern the interpretation and rendition of any arbitral awards, as well as all issues of interpretation of the contract, and that the Appeal Court of Tehran was the default appointing authority, the Court concluded that this arbitration-forum clause was an integral, non-severable unit and that it had to be enforced, or not, in its entirety.

Despite the Fifth Circuit’s guidance and specific reference to National Iranian Oil, the District Court’s decision last month avoided entirely the question of integration versus severability of the arbitration agreement, on the one hand, and the choice of Caracas as the seat, on the other. It simply found that arbitration in Caracas is no longer reasonable in view of the deterioration of diplomatic relations between the U.S. and Venezuela and the record of pro-Government bias in the Venezuelan legal system established by Northrop Grumman’s expert evidence. The Court ordered arbitration, ordered the parties to submit an agreement on another place of arbitration within 15 days, failing which the Court would select a new seat of arbitration.  According to the docket, no agreement on a seat has been submitted nor has any order designating a seat been made. Instead, a Notice of Appeal has been filed by the Government of Venezuela. 

The FAA, Section 16, makes an order denying a motion to compel arbitration under the Convention and Chapter Two immediately appealable, and conversely prohibits an immediate appeal from an order under Chapter Two directing arbitration unless the District Court certifies a controlling question of law for immediate appeal (which this Court has not done). One wonders how Section 16 applies to an order that granted in part Venezuela’s motion to compel arbitration by directing arbitration in a place other than the place stated in the agreement.  Seemingly, the issue of severability or integration is jurisdictional, as well as potentially dispositive of the merits: If the arbitration clause is fully integrated, the District Court order effectively denied Venezuela’s motion to compel arbitration in Caracas, and should be appealable.  If the arbitration agreement and agreement on the seat are severable, Venezuela’s motion to compel arbitration has been granted, and the decision setting aside the agreement on the seat might be regarded as interlocutory.   But this issue should bring the Fifth Circuit back to the text of Section 206 of the FAA.   In a Convention case, the District Court’s power is to compel arbitration “in accordance with the agreement at any place therein provided for.”  The text of Section 206 strongly suggests that the purported “partial granting” of a motion seeking that relief, by ordering arbitration at a place not provided for in the agreement, should be regarded as a denial of the motion to compel, and further that this was an order the District Court was without power to make.  

Arbitration law watchers will be watching for the Fifth Circuit’s next decision in the Northrop Grumman- Venezuela case.  Even assuming the District Court had solid grounds for concluding that the legal and political environment in Venezuela are unfavorable for arbitration, the Fifth Circuit may hesitate to accept this as a basis to discard entirely the arbitration clause, because the consequence is to expose both parties to concurrent litigations in the courts of the United States and Venezuela. Perhaps one of the parties will point out to the Fifth Circuit that in an ICC arbitration there are steps available that might mitigate the impact of the hostile environment, notably that the Tribunal may conduct its hearings and proceedings and deliberations in another location even though the juridical seat of the arbitration remains in Venezuela (ICC Rules 14(2) and 14(3)). The Fifth Circuit might also consider the prospects for enforceability of the Award and execution of the resulting judgment in States other than Venezuela, even if the Venezuelan courts purported to set aside the award. Further, the appellate court may wish to consider the possibility that the U.S. Claimant might obtain from the Tribunal an order for security, and the court may take into account the statements of the Government of Venezuela as to its prospective willingness to comply with such an order should one be entered. Each of these factors should impact an analysis of whether enforcement of the arbitration clause for arbitration with a seat in Caracas is “impossible” or “impracticable.”    

Finally, I present a war story, one I have often told.  More than ten years ago I was counsel an ICC arbitration against the Government of Serbia for an American claimant whose property, allegedly, had been expropriated by the Milosevic regime after the Serbian Government had assumed ownership of my client’s private Yugoslav joint venture partner.  By virtue of this assumption of contract rights, the U.S. party found itself in privity with the Serbian Government in a contract that provided for ICC arbitration with a seat in Belgrade.  Belgrade in 2000 was the scene of NATO shelling, drive-by political assassinations, manipulated elections, abuses of political dissidents, and an intimidated and regime-controlled judiciary – a scenario quite different from the one that prevailed when my client signed the contract in 1990.

Claimant asked the ICC Court to conclude that the agreement on the seat of arbitration had ceased to exist (under the civil law principle rebus sic stantibus), such that the ICC Court, in accordance with ICC Rule 14(1), could fill the void by selecting a seat. The Court referred the factual and contract interpretation issues to the Tribunal for decision, hearings were held, extensive evidence was presented. Before the Tribunal issued an award, Milosevic was ousted from power in a popular coup, and was replaced by a new and purportedly more democratic regime.  The Partial Award took into account the regime change, and concluded that the agreement on the seat of arbitration remained intact.

Could Northrop Grumman follow the same course at this stage and take the issue of the seat of arbitration to the ICC Court? One would think so.  Perhaps in view of the latest appeal filed by Venezuela, this is a course of action that will receive serious consideration.

 

One Response to “A U.S. Court Changes the Seat of an International Arbitration”

  1. This article is an excellent. It provides clear explanation of the current arbitration law regarding the Seat of an International Arbitration supported by the case law and by the facts from the author experience. The most important,
    the article expains the steps available to resolve the issue, and the course of action as well. I hope that the ideas expressed in this article will have a positive impact on the Court’s next decision in this case.