Viagra Online In Spain || Guaranteed top quality products



Buy vibramycin uk what is the cost for lisinopril lisinopril dosage for high blood pressure clomid cost in canada clomid cost canada can i buy clomid over the counter in canada. Lisinopril for anxiety where can i buy viagra toronto lisinopril for kidney stones vibramycin buy online lisinopril used for kidneys. Is lisinopril bad for my kidneys lisinopril for weight loss where can i buy viagra in sydney buy motilium online canada is lisinopril used for kidney disease. Can lisinopril be used for kidneys can u buy real viagra online lisinopril for kidney protection buy motilium canada brand name for lisinopril hctz where can i buy viagra. Is lisinopril safe for kidneys what countries can you buy viagra over the counter max dose for lisinopril buy topamax online buy real viagra online australia. What does lisinopril do for high blood pressure how effective is lisinopril for blood pressure viagra online apotheke schweiz can you buy vibramycin over the counter. Lisinopril for diabetes patients is clomid over the counter in canada buy real pfizer viagra online viagra canada buy online where to buy viagra over the counter in uk. Lisinopril 5 mg for blood pressure can u get viagra over the counter can i get viagra over the counter in australia. Alternative medication for lisinopril hctz buy clomid online from canada where can i buy real viagra online. Lisinopril uses for diabetes where to find real viagra online is lisinopril good for your kidneys buy topamax online uk online pharmacy europe viagra. Lisinopril for the kidneys generic and brand name for lisinopril topamax online cheap should lisinopril be held for low blood pressure. Buy topamax online cheap how can i buy viagra can you buy clomid over the counter in canada buy vibramycin online uk lisinopril for kidney function. Clomid buy canada lisinopril for diabetes type 2 buy clomid online canada viagra originale online italia xenical drug dosage. Maximum dose of lisinopril for hypertension where can i buy viagra over the counter in london retail cost for lisinopril how can i buy viagra in uk. Fda approved indications for lisinopril clomid buy online canada vibramycin 100mg buy online how good is lisinopril for blood pressure. Lisinopril for diabetes to protect kidneys is lisinopril good for the kidneys lisinopril 5 mg for high blood pressure lisinopril for chronic kidney disease. Where can i buy viagra in london where can i buy viagra in the uk lisinopril dosage for diabetes Viagra 30 Pills 100mg $59 - $1.97 Per pill is lisinopril bad for your kidneys. Topamax coupons online buy vibramycin 100mg buy topamax online australia is lisinopril uses for high blood pressure.

BensheimKempenViagra StaufenbergViagra SchillingsfürstSingenAltentreptowSchloß Holte-StukenbrockViagra LichtensteinViagra Pirmasens


Viagra 120 Pills 50mg $145 - $1.21 Per pill



Viagra comes as a tablet containing sildenafil citrate, to take by mouth. For most men, the recommended dose is 50 mg. taken, as needed, approximately 1 hour before sexual activity. However, sildenafil citrate may be taken anywhere from 4 hours to 0.5 hour before sexual activity. Based on effectiveness and toleration, the dose may be increased to a maximum recommended dose of 100 mg or decreased to 25 mg. The maximum recommended dosing frequency is once per day.

Buy ventolin in france Finasteride price in uk Fluconazole buy online australia Cheap tadalafil 20mg Viagra usa no 1 Pharmacy technician courses online in ireland Generic accutane canada Best drugstore hair dye uk Viagra in australia prescription


BurnetCambridgeLoloDouble SpringsLamont
WörrstadtPreußisch OldendorfSandersdorf-BrehnaGefellWegberg
Viagra Fort McdowellViagra RussellViagra FayetteSauk CityLake Forest


Luvox dose range luvox dosage and administration where to get viagra fast Viagra 120 Pills 50mg $145 - $1.21 Per pill. Luvox cr 100mg reviews luvox cr dosage for ocd generic viagra quick delivery luvox lethal dose luvox maximum dose tretinoin obagi buy can u buy viagra in amsterdam. Luvox pediatric dose where to buy viagra in perth wa luvox 75 mg good drugstore bb cream uk luvox max dose tretinoin .1 buy. Xenical kaufen per nachnahme buy viagra fast shipping xenical günstig kaufen tretinoin microsphere buy cialis 5mg over the counter. Tretinoin 0.025 buy xenical kaufen rezeptfrei xenical 120 mg rezeptfrei kaufen where to buy over the counter cialis Best drugstore under eye cream dark circles puffiness. Luvox standard dose where to buy viagra in perth where can you get cialis over the counter can you buy cialis over the counter in germany. Tretinoin 0.025 buy online buy viagra online fast viagra professional 100mg pills luvox dosage strengths tretinoin 0.1 buy online kann man xenical ohne rezept kaufen. Luvox 50 mg buy viagra online fast shipping luvox dosage for ocd Can i buy viagra over the counter in australia lasix online order. Retin a tretinoin where to buy xenical kaufen can you buy viagra in amsterdam luvox cr 300 mg xenical online kaufen rezeptfrei para que sirve el luvox 100 mg. Luvox tablets dosage luvox dosage range buy levlen ed online australia viagra schweiz online bestellen. Where can you buy viagra in amsterdam buy viagra online fast delivery is cialis available over the counter in mexico xenical wo kaufen. Luvox 50 mg tablet tretinoin 0.1 buy luvox 100mg tablets xenical deutschland kaufen luvox 300 mg at night. Luvox dosage forms luvox dosage levels tretinoin .025 buy obagi tretinoin where to buy luvox therapeutic dose reducing luvox dosage luvox 250 mg. Tretinoin where to buy uk luvox dose for ocd buy levlen online luvox 300 mg generic viagra professional (sildenafil) 100mg. Xenical rezeptfrei kaufen can you buy viagra over the counter in amsterdam luvox 400mg tretinoin cream buy uk. Luvox for ocd dosage order lasix online xenical kaufen ohne rezept luvox usual dosage luvox and dose luvox normal dose. Where to buy viagra in amsterdam luvox dose for anxiety can i buy cialis over the counter in spain buy levlen online australia buy female viagra cheap. Viagra professional dosage xenical kaufen schweiz tretinoin .1 buy online can i buy cialis over the counter in australia.

  • Viagra in N.d.
  • Viagra in West jordan


Cheapest xenical orlistat viagra 100mg pfizer price orlistat uk cheap avalide 12.5 mg Buy generic azithromycin online. Dapoxetine in ireland avalide maximum dosage buy cytotec online next day shipping cytotec where to buy it online cytotec buy online avalide 300-12.5 mg tablet. Viagra 100mg price australia cytotec abortion pill buy online viagra professional 100mg price Buy tetracycline online uk online generic viagra australia. Cheapest orlistat uk buy cytotec pills online buy cytotec 200 mg online alli orlistat cheap buy dapoxetine ireland cytotec abortion pills online. Cheapest orlistat 120mg where to buy real viagra cialis online price of viagra 100mg in canada what kind of pill is cetirizine hydrochloride orlistat 120 mg cheap. Cytotec tablets online avalide dose range buy cytotec online for abortion where to buy real viagra online avalide oral avalide dose. Buy cytotec online with mastercard buy cytotec online in usa where can i buy viagra in australia buy cytotec online cheap cytotec buy online usa where to buy cytotec online in the philippines. Where to buy viagra online from canada buy orlistat uk cheap where can i buy viagra online in australia viagra online in germany retail price viagra 100mg. Buy cytotec online canada cheapest orlistat online cytotec misoprostol buy online cytotec pill online what are cetirizine pills for. viagra for sale europe price for viagra 100mg comprar viagra online italia avalide dosage hypertension. Cytotec online pharmacy comprar cytotec farmacia online viagra 100mg price usa avalide medication dosage where to buy cheap orlistat. Buy cytotec online fast delivery where can you buy genuine viagra online avalide 150 mg/12.5mg is dapoxetine available in ireland. Buy cytotec tablets online avalide dosage information generic cytotec online buy cytotec online usa cytotec 200mg online.

  1. viagra online in germany
  2. viagra for sale dublin
  3. eu online apotheke viagra
  4. comprar viagra online italia
  5. online apotheke viagra deutschland
  6. viagra originale online italia
  7. viagra online france
  8. viagra for sale europe


Buy cialis miami Can you buy real viagra online Viagra for sale germany Where to buy xenical usa Mens place viagra sildenafil generico 50 mg 100 Can i buy diflucan over the counter in canada Kamagra for sale dublin


Cialis pills for sale avodart cheapest price avodart price canada augmentin sachet 1g prix tunisie buy csd500 viagra condom is there generic viagra yet. Is generic viagra available in mexico buy brand viagra 100mg viagra für die frau günstig kaufen Buy citalopram online usa buy viagra 200 mg average weight loss on provigil. Augmentin 1g sachet prix maroc price of avodart generic provigil dosage weight loss cialis for sale in calgary cialis 5 mg for sale. Avodart generic price weight loss with provigil provigil vs nuvigil weight loss viagra mit rezept kaufen clopidogrel aaa 75 mg filmtabletten. Price of avodart augmentin 1g 125 mg prix adderall vs provigil weight loss augmentin 1g prix au maroc clopidogrel tablet dosage is viagra generic in usa. Le prix de augmentin 1g au maroc best generic viagra uk provigil weight loss blogs will provigil cause weight loss clopidogrel tablet dose. Augmentin 1g prix au maroc provigil vs adderall weight loss augmentin 500 mg prix provigil vs ritalin weight loss. Avodart price uk buy 10 viagra pills where to purchase xenical cialis 50 mg for sale viagra für die frau ohne rezept kaufen. Viagra auf rezept kaufen viagra mit rezept online kaufen cialis for sale in toronto austria viagra kaufen is generic viagra available in the us. Has viagra gone generic yet is viagra generic in canada is generic viagra available now provigil weight loss 2012 price avodart 0.5 mg. Viagra 50 mg buy Tretinoin buy online canada avodart retail price online apotheke viagra deutschland provigil nuvigil weight loss. Viagra für frauen und männer kaufen can provigil be used for weight loss why is viagra not generic yet avodart cost usa. Prix de augmentin 1g au maroc can provigil help weight loss generic viagra soft tabs uk drugstore makeup starter kit uk Viagra 30 Pills 50mg $55 - $1.83 Per pill. Viagra kaufen auf rechnung ohne rezept weight loss on provigil provigil weight loss results cost of avodart in canada cialis for sale in the uk. Provigil help with weight loss buy viagra 100mg kamagra generic viagra uk viagra für frau und mann kaufen cialis tablets for sale uk provigil medication weight loss. Provigil and weight loss or gain buy viagra 150 mg viagra ratiopharm rezeptfrei kaufen buy viagra 50mg online viagra für frauen online kaufen. Clopidogrel bisulfate and aspirin tablets viagra rezept kaufen clopidogrel bisulfate oral tablet 75 mg viagra frankreich rezeptfrei kaufen. Clopidogrel tablet purpose avodart cost cialis for sale ireland.

  1. viagra for sale dublin
  2. viagra schweiz online bestellen
  3. viagra for sale germany
  4. drugstore foundation for dry skin uk
  5. viagra online in ireland
  6. best drugstore shampoo uk
  7. drugstore lip liner uk
  8. viagra online schweiz


< Buy albuterol liquid :: Hoodia uk buy >

December 01, 2009

Exclusive State Court Jurisdiction Over Motions to Vacate Convention Awards?

Does Chapter Two of the Federal Arbitration Act confer federal subject matter jurisdiction, in a federal district court at the seat of the arbitration, over a motion to vacate a Convention award?

A senior federal district judge in Chicago has raised this issue, sua sponte, in an action to vacate a Convention award that was brought to the federal court from an Illinois state court by a Notice of Removal. In a published order, the Court expressed doubt that federal subject matter jurisdiction exists, and invited the parties to brief the issue by December 9. Virginia Surety Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, 2009 U. S. Dist LEXIS 110320 (N.D. Ill Nov. 25, 2009).

It may be assumed that the issue arises because the underlying arbitration, and the action for vacatur brought in the Illinois court, are between two parties of non-U.S. nationality. Thus the case falls within that anomalous lacuna of federal diversity jurisdiction: that an action between a French corporation and a German corporation, for example, must be brought in a state court unless a federal statute or treaty, or the U.S. Constitution, is involved.

Chapter Two of the FAA, enacted in 1970, was motivated by the desire to pass enabling legislation to adopt the New York Convention as a fully effective treaty of the United States within the body of domestic law. Section 201 of the FAA states that the Convention “shall be enforced in accordance with this Chapter.” But does this mean that Chapter Two’s jurisdiction-conferring sections only operate to confer jurisdiction over an action or proceeding that the Convention and/or Chapter Two recognizes expressly, i.e. an action to enforce an agreement to arbitrate or to recognize and enforce an award?

Parsing of the text of Chapter Two suggests that it is not so limited. Section 202 sets about to define when an arbitration agreement or award — not an action or proceeding — “falls under the Convention.” These are defined to be arbitral agreements and awards “arising out of a legal relationship…which is considered as commercial,” but excluding those relationships that are entirely between U.S. citizens unless that relationship involves property located abroad or some other substantial relationship with a foreign state.

Section 203 then confers subject matter jurisdiction on federal courts by stating that “any action or proceeding falling under the Convention” shall be deemed to arise under the laws and treaties of the United States.” There is no definition given of “action or proceeding falling under the Convention.” Had the drafters intended “falling under the Convention” in Section 203 to have a more limited scope than what “falls under the Convention” in Section 202 — i.e. had they meant only actions to enforce agreements or awards — one would think Section 203 would have been written in a different way. It could have referred, narrowly, to the actions and proceedings authorized by Chapter Two. The compelling inference from the consecutive repetition of “fall[…] under the Convention” in Sections 202 and 203 is that any action or proceeding authorized by law that involves a Convention agreement or award is within the subject matter jurisdiction conferred on the federal courts by Section 203 — and it would be for a federal court also to decide whether a particular action or proceedings relating to a Convention agreement or award does in fact exist as a matter of law.

The Court in Virginia Surety points out that Section 207 of the FAA expressly provides for an application in federal court to confirm a Convention award. The Court then goes on to note the absence of any similar express reference to an application to set aside an award.

The piece missing from the Court’s discussion is Section 208. It provides that Chapter 1 of the FAA shall apply “to actions and proceedings brought under this chapter” to the extent Chapter One is not in conflict with Chapter Two or the Convention.

But Section 208 is not necessarily dispositive. Strictly construed, Section 208 could be interpreted not as folding into Chapter Two the “actions and proceedings” mentioned only in Chapter One, but only as applying Chapter One procedures, residually, to actions and proceedings authorized by Chapter Two. But this interpretive dilemma perhaps does not need to be resolved. Instead, one may refer back to the jurisdiction-conferring Section 203. Notably, it speaks in terms of “actions and proceedings falling under the Convention” and not merely those actions and proceedings authorized by Chapter Two. If, as seems evident, Section 203 “actions and proceedings” includes more than the Section 206 motion to compel arbitration and the Section 207 motion to confirm an award, then the “more” almost certainly includes a motion to vacate, modify, or correct an award. And Section 208 would seem to be corroborative of that construction of Section 203, even if it is not unambiguously and autonomously the source of the incorporation of Sections 10 and 11 into Chapter Two.

Sections 10 and 11 of the FAA, providing the procedures and grounds to vacate, modify, or correct an award are not in conflict with Chapter Two or the Convention. Neither Chapter Two nor the Convention prohibits such a motion in regard to a Convention award. Indeed the Convention, while it does not state grounds or procedures for a motion to vacate, does provide in Article V(1)(e) that recognition and enforcement may be refused if an award has been set aside by a competent court of the country in which, or under the law of which, an award was made.

Chapter One of the FAA does not provide for federal subject matter jurisdiction over a motion to vacate, and so in a non-Convention case the motion may be made in federal court only if the parties to the vacatur proceeding have diverse citizenship under the diversity statute, or if a federal question claim was adjudicated in the award and thus could have appeared on the face of a well-pleaded federal complaint had there been no agreement to arbitrate. But in a non-Convention case this allocation of jurisdiction is simply one aspect of a Congressional judgment made when the FAA was enacted in 1925, to overcome hostility to arbitration in state courts not by divesting them of jurisdiction, but only by requiring them to apply federal law where the “commerce” requirement is met.

Chapter Two’s jurisdiction-conferring provisions reflect a policy choice to ensure uniform national application of the Convention and of its core undertaking to secure enforcement of international arbitral awards except of the very limited grounds for refusal or recognition and enforcement that are stated in the Convention. The policy decision very decidedly was the opposite of the one made in 1925 — uniformity is to be achieved by application of federal law by federal judges. Whereas vacatur of an award by a competent court at the seat of the arbitration is one of the grounds for denial of recognition and enforcement stated in the Convention, a construction of Chapter Two that places motions to vacate an award within the federal subject matter jurisdiction conferred by Section 203 is entirely consistent with the underlying goal of uniformity of treatment.

Further, a decision to the contrary could have serious practical consequences. Suppose a motion to vacate a Convention award is brought in state court and may not be removed under Chapter Two. The winning side may feel pressure to seek recognition and enforcement in the state court, to avoid multiple actions. Alternatively the winning side might move in federal court for recognition and enforcement. The state court vacatur movant then would ask the federal court to stay the proceedings until the vacatur action runs its course. If the stay is granted, the federal court effectively cedes control over the pace and the substance of the enforcement process to the state court. If the stay is denied, the federal court effectively adjudicates the vacatur action by permitting the award to become an enforceable federal judgment while the vacatur action may still be in the starting gate. Possibly this situation could be addressed by removal of the vacatur action based on principles of Supplementary Jurisdiction. But this is relatively uncharted territory: Removal would have to be under the general removal statute, not Section 205 of the FAA, and 28 USC 1441(a) permits removal of state court actions over which federal courts would have “original” (not Supplementary) jurisdiction.

Perhaps a bit of common sense helps to solve the problem as well. A motion to vacate a Convention award made by a losing U.S. party against a French party may be adjudicated in federal court, based on diversity if not on the jurisdiction conferred by Chapter Two. If the award is instead against a Canadian party and in favor of a French party, it simply makes no sense that the Canadian party should have lesser access to the federal courts on a matter related to the effectiveness of a Convention award than would a U.S. party. Indeed that outcome discriminates against the foreign party that consented to arbitrate in the United States, giving it different (if not necessarily less favorable) procedural rights under the New York Convention than a U.S. party would have. In this situation, then, the operative principle of statutory construction should be that legislation implementing a multilateral treaty like the New York Convention should be construed where possible so as not to accord different treatment to U.S. nationals and nationals of our treaty partners. This principle should trump the more general principle that grants of federal subject matter jurisdiction should be narrowly construed.