Where Can I Order Accutane Online - Yes Here || Guaranteed top quality products

Fda indications for zyprexa buy retin a 0.05 online order generic accutane online Sildenafil dose in raynaud's buy flagyl australia buy viagra soft online. Where's the best place to buy viagra online augmentin tablets for sale buy flagyl 2g online accutane second course dose order accutane online uk. Online viagra purchase buying viagra in uk online buy retin a .05 online fda approved indications for zyprexa accutane highest dosage. Accutane 60 mg results buy flagyl antibiotics buying viagra pills online accutane 10 mg every other day 20 mg accutane a week buy cheap accutane uk. Cheap canadian viagra online viagra online without pre accutane low dosage effectiveness female viagra buy online accutane 20 mg buy buy flagyl in australia. Www.buy viagra online 40 mg accutane for sale buy retin a 0.05 cream online arrested for buying viagra online buy flagyl online fast delivery penalty for buying viagra online. Truth about buying viagra online accutane dosage once a day accutane 90 mg a day order accutane online from canada buy flagyl er. Busted buying viagra online online viagra usa buy flagyl ireland zyprexa indications fda low dose accutane for rosacea results. Online viagra with mastercard accutane dosage and administration where to buy accutane uk canadian viagra online order buy flagyl suspension buy retin a 0.05 online pharmacy. Online viagra safe accutane 60 mg accutane dosage bodybuilding accutane 30 mg a day buy viagra online price buy flagyl er online accutane dosage chart weight.

RedcliffeKranichfeldRamstein-MiesenbachFriesackMarienbergMülheim an der RuhrNeumarkt-Sankt VeitLugauElze

Accutane 120 pills 10 mg - 59.08$
Accutane 120 pills 40 mg - 205.27$
Accutane 270 pills 20 mg - 295.48$

Accutane is a powerful medicine used for the treatment of moderate to severe acne.

LauncestonMount IsaDubboNanaimoAlice Springs
LivoniaFalkensteinBassettAccutane RoseburgMinnesota Lake
SomervilleCoeymansSonoraAccutane Big SkySanto

Zofran odt dosage for adults accutane isotretinoin buy online accutane generic cost zofran dosage for pediatric patients. Buy accutane online 2013 topamax cost uk coupons for viagra or cialis how much is accutane in ireland buy zovirax cream for genital herpes. Accutane kaufen deutschland topamax generic cost buy accutane pills online buy accutane canada online speman ds dosage buy zovirax cream online. Zofran dose for child topamax cost in uk zofran dosage for 2 year old dose of zofran for 3 year old zofran dosage for toddlers accutane northern ireland zovirax pills buy online. Buy accutane 20mg online buy 20 mg accutane online online coupon for viagra zofran dose for toddler accutane safe to buy online. Buy accutane online canada pharmacy buy accutane online zofran used for headaches buy accutane online in canada what is the max dose for zofran zofran dosage for a 3 year old. Topamax uk price pediatric dose for zofran iv much does generic topamax cost speman tablets dosage viagra tablet for man online drug store prices for viagra. 4 mg zofran for toddler cheapest price for topamax generic drugs for accutane how much does generic topamax cost without insurance. Augmentin printable coupon buy accutane online nz speman forte tablets dosage zofran iv dosage for nausea cost for generic topamax. Buy zovirax ointment canada buy zovirax cream 10g zofran dosage for a 6 year old accutane pills online zofran for stomach virus while pregnant. Zofran odt dosage for infants viagra for sale tampa speman dose zofran dosing for pediatrics price of generic topamax pediatric safe dose for zofran. Buy accutane online yahoo answers topamax generic price best place buy accutane online max daily dose for zofran. Accutane dispensing rules ireland accutane online cheap how much zofran for a 6 year old zofran for toddlers dosage levitra doses recommendation. Buy accutane isotretinoin online buy zovirax cream usa pediatric dose for zofran accutane buy online australia where can i buy zovirax online. Topamax generic cost without insurance price of accutane in ireland accutane in ireland zofran dosage for stomach flu online consultation for viagra. Dosage of zofran for 3 year old zofran odt dose for 2 year old viagra for sale 50mg buy accutane online cheap canada. Viagra for womens where to buy uk zofran dose for pediatrics zofran dosage for migraines best online source for viagra cheapest pharmacy for viagra. Doses for levitra zofran dosage for pediatrics what is the generic version of accutane speman forte dosage cheapest viagra for sale buy accutane online with prescription.

  • Accutane in Palm bay
  • Accutane in Lubbock

Buy accutane online with mastercard where can i buy hoodia in canada chloroquine tablets dose amoxicillin need prescription. Buy accutane online united states boots chloroquine and proguanil anti-malaria tablets price using differin gel after accutane non prescription amoxicillin uk. Sample prescription for amoxicillin suspension where to buy real hoodia accutane online order what is the pill finasteride for. Chloroquine phosphate tablets ip 500mg clomid bestellen deutschland finasteride pills online where can you buy accutane online finasteride pillole. Buy accutane online in uk best place to buy accutane online uk finasteride e pillola anticoncezionale. Amoxicillin prescription for strep throat finasteride hair pills accutane generic brand names chloroquine phosphate tablets usp 250 mg. Where to buy unique hoodia in canada finasteride pills hair loss celebrex over the counter or prescription accutane buy online us writing a prescription for amoxicillin suspension. Accutane gel rosacea where to buy unique hoodia in australia buy accutane gel cutting finasteride pills. First medicine online pharmacy discount code celebrex or ibuprofen for back pain Buy levitra online australia buy accutane online canadian pharmacy. Hoodia gordonii pills buy where to buy unique hoodia in stores non prescription amoxicillin 500mg finasteride pill size. Finasteride pills uk buy finasteride pills chloroquine phosphate tablets 500mg buy accutane online usa finasteride pillole. Amoxicillin 875 mg prescription finasteride pills online generic brands of accutane amoxicillin need prescription uk factors affecting the disintegration and dissolution of chloroquine phosphate/starch tablets. Proguanil and chloroquine malaria tablets best place buy accutane online where can i buy real hoodia chloroquine malaria tablets boots.

accutane online order
discount generic accutane
order accutane online uk
discount card for accutane
can i order accutane online
order accutane online cheap
can you order accutane online
order accutane online from canada

Order accutane over the counter pericarditis treatment colchicine dose buy zydex accutane uk over the counter equivalent to accutane Accutane 120 pills 40 mg - 205.27$. Colchicine in gout dosage cetirizine hydrochloride and pseudoephedrine dosage colchicine dose for peyronie's disease cetirizine dose for itching. Cetirizine otc dosage amitriptyline hcl doses phentermine k 25 tablets wo kann man viagra frei kaufen colchicine 0.6mg dosage cetirizine hydrochloride syrup dosage. Colchicine loading dose where to buy accutane online uk buy accutane london dosage of colchicine for pericarditis. Buying accutane online uk buy roche accutane online uk phentermine pink round tablets original viagra online kaufen order accutane online australia. Colchicine 0.6 mg oral tablet cetirizine syrup paediatric dose colchicine dose pericardial effusion cetirizine dose range. Best place to buy accutane online uk colchicine dose for pseudogout cetirizine dose by weight accutane over the counter accutane acne medicine cetirizine paediatric dosage. Wo kann man viagra günstig kaufen Buy generic synthroid dosage of colchicine phentermine diet tablets uk dosage of cetirizine for babies. Over the counter accutane for acne amitriptyline doses for migraines where to buy accutane in uk generic accutane uk colchicine houde 1mg dosage cetirizine syrup dose for child. Buy accutane online from uk colchicine dosage philippines colchicine dose long term buy accutane 40 mg uk cetirizine hydrochloride liquid dosage. Cetirizina dose maxima is accutane sold over the counter colchicine 1mg tablet colchicine safe dose range colchicine dosage for behcet's disease. Colchicine dosage what is cost of atorvastatin cetirizine dosage for elderly colchicine dose urticaria cetirizine dose medicines.ie colchicine dosage uk accutane discount card. Can you buy accutane over the counter colchicine dose gout flare cetirizine dosage peds.

  • drug stores for sale in canada
  • best drugstore bb cream usa
  • accutane online order
  • order accutane online from canada
  • order accutane online cheap
  • drugstore bb cream usa
  • names for drug store
  • order accutane online
  • best drugstore bb cream us
  • accutane prescription discounts
  • can you order accutane online
  • drug store shampoo for hair loss
  • drug store shampoo for curly hair

< Viagra to buy in london :: Drugstore makeup free shipping >

October 31, 2014

Coping With The Party Boycott

An occasionally encountered problem in international commercial arbitration is the Party Boycott. I will use that term here to refer to the situation where a Respondent in a pending arbitration registers its objection to arbitral jurisdiction systematically through a two-pronged strategy: (1) seeking an anti-arbitration injunction in a friendly court, and (2) refusing any participation in the arbitration itself.

Formation of the Tribunal

When the Tribunal is to be formed according to a list procedure by the administering institution, the Boycotting Party’s refusal to strike-and-rank the listed candidates typically entails that the institution will select the arbitrator or arbitrators. (As a preliminary matter the Boycotter may well argue to the institution that the arbitration should not proceed, but if the institution is satisfied prima facie of the existence of an arbitration agreement providing for arbitration administered by that institution, this effort ordinarily should fail). In the strike-and-rank scenario, the Boycotter succeeds in depriving the Claimant of input into the selection of the Tribunal. If the parties’ agreement provides for party-appointed arbitrators, then the Boycotter’s refusal to appoint entails that the appointing authority will make an appointment the Boycotter’s co-arbitrator, and that the Claimant’s party appointee and the co-arbitrator who has been administratively appointed will seek to reach agreement on a chair. Two of the three members of the Tribunal have been selected without input from the Boycotter.

Boycotter Requests Stay of the Arbitration

Invited to join a conference call to discuss a procedural timetable, the Boycotter may decline to confirm a date for such a proceeding, object to its “unilateral” scheduling, and request the Tribunal to stay proceedings at least for a time sufficient to allow the Boycotter to apply to a friendly court for an anti-arbitration injunction. The Boycotter proposes to invoke judicial authority of a court that is not at the seat of the arbitration, and whose arbitral procedural law does not apply to the arbitration. The Boycotter might for instance assert that it is a company in liquidation and that the liquidation court’s jurisdiction ousts that of the arbitral tribunal.  Whatever may be the merit, or lack of it, of that contention, from the perspective of arbitration procedure the question of the effect of the liquidation on arbitral jurisdiction should be addressed by the Tribunal and/or by a court at the seat of the arbitration unless the arbitration law of the seat, exceptionally, were to recognize the competence of the liquidation court to decide the issue.

Ordinarily, therefore, a motion to stay the arbitration in deference to a prospective jurisdiction-related decision from a court lacking competence on the jurisdiction issue ought to be denied.

Procedural Timetable and Time Limits for the Award

The first procedural conference is convened by telephone, with only the Claimant’s counsel appearing, the Boycotter and its litigation counsel (who requested the stay) having been duly notified. If the Claimant consents to bear the cost for a transcript, a court reporter records the proceedings, and Boycotter’s litigation counsel receives a copy.

Suppose a provision in the arbitration agreement requires a final award within a very stringent time limit measured from the formation of the Tribunal? Claimant cannot reasonably prepare complete written submissions on the merits and appear at a hearing within the time limit. Of course Claimant is willing to extend the time limit. But the Boycotter’s actual consent is not obtainable due to the Boycott, and neither the Tribunal nor the Claimant relishes the prospect that an Award made after the deadline might be denied enforcement on the ground that the Tribunal became functus officio at the time limit.

One solution is for the Tribunal to construe the time limit provision in the form of an Interim Award, deciding the issue of whether strict compliance with the time limit is required. If the Tribunal decides that strict compliance is not required, and the Boycotter has declined to take a position in the proceedings on this question, the Boycotter may find it difficult later on to deny the effectiveness of a Final Award on the basis that the time limit should be enforced strictly and the Tribunal ceased to have power before the Final Award was delivered.

Boycotter Obtains Anti-Arbitration Injunction From Friendly Court

The liquidation court in Boycotter’s home jurisdiction (not the arbitral seat) finds for the Boycotter on its application to enjoin the arbitration. The order operates in personam against Claimant, directing Claimant to proceed no further with the arbitration save to ask the Tribunal to stay the proceedings while Claimant pursues appellate remedies to vacate the injunction.

Now the arbitration is at a crossroads, and several factors are in play:

1) The Claimant submits to the Tribunal that while it disagrees with the injunction on the merits and as the Boycotter-friendly non-seat court’s power to impose it, the Claimant is loathe to risk a contempt judgment and therefore seeks to proceed no further with the arbitration on the merits until it can secure an order vacating the injunction.

2) A court with no supervisory power over the arbitration derived from the arbitration agreement or any national arbitration law has determined in an impactful way — via its own contempt powers exercisable over the Claimant — the competence of the Arbitral Tribunal,

3) Claimant assuredly would ask the Tribunal to rule on the jurisdiction issue were it not constrained by the injunction and by the fear of contempt penalties,

4) If the Tribunal accedes to Claimant’s request for a stay, without doing anything more, it gives legitimacy to the illegitimate (even if it were substantively correct) injunction of the liquidation court, in effect allowing contempt powers to trump all applicable arbitration rules and law.

5) Yet if the Tribunal insists that the case go forward — on the agreed accelerated timetable — it forces Claimant to a difficult  election: risk contempt penalties and trust in the appellate process to reverse the injunction and the contempt, violate the Tribunal’s order to proceed, or withdraw the arbitration.

Shall The Tribunal Retreat Into Cold Storage?

What is a Tribunal to do? In the case that inspires this post, the Tribunal (seated in London) elected to make an award on the issue of whether the liquidation proceeding divested the arbitral tribunal of jurisdiction. Having in the first procedural order directed both parties to provide copies to the Tribunal of all submissions made the Boycotter-friendly non-seat court relating to the arbitration, and all orders of that court relating to the arbitration, the Tribunal was fortunate to secure Claimant’s compliance with that direction notwithstanding the anti-arbitration injunction.

Armed with the same factual and legal record made by the parties in the liquidation court, the fact that Respondent and Claimant were for different reasons (derived from the same injunction) unwilling to brief the issue to the Tribunal was not seen as a deterrent to a decision. The Tribunal proceeded to a Partial Award finding that its jurisdiction was intact. And having given that award, the Tribunal rather than grant the Claimant’s request for a stay, instead amended the procedural timetable to defer the merits hearing and pre-hearing submissions for a time sufficient for Claimant to pursue a first-level appeal against the injunction.

The Tribunal in such circumstances is rightfully uneasy at the prospect of granting either a proceedings stay of indefinite duration, or, what would eventually amount to the same thing, seriatim adjustments of the hearing timetable as each previously-fixed set of submission and hearing dates approaches and the illegitimate judicial anti-arbitration injunction remains in force while appellate challenge proceeds at a pace that seems to reflect the appellate court’s indifference to the Tribunal’s desire to proceed on the timetable it has established.

It would seem that a decent respect for the arbitration law that the Tribunal has a mandate to apply should bring into play a self-imposed obligation of the Tribunal to express in every appropriate way its refusal to be governed by the illegitimate injunction. But to insist that the enjoined Claimant defy the injunction and risk contempt of the enjoining court seems untenable: It would be an abuse of arbitral power to insist that a party bear this risk or, if it should refuse to bear it, have its claim determined against it on the merits based on its refusal to proceed with the hearing.

The solution decided upon in the case that inspires this post was for the Tribunal to end is mandate without reaching the merits. Claimant was not put to the choice of proceeding to the merits or not, but instead was given the choice of proceeding to the merits or withdrawing the arbitration without prejudice. The Claimant’s claim and its right to arbitrate that claim were preserved.

It will not be in every case where the Claimant desires a stay pending judicial appeals of the injunction that the Tribunal would opt for this solution. But the judgment made here was that the mission of an Arbitral Tribunal is to render an Award resolving the disputes presented by the parties, and if it has no reasonable prospect of being able to do so on a reasonable time horizon because of a judicial injunction that the Tribunal has determined to be procedurally and substantively illegitimate, then discontinuing the arbitration without impairment of the Claimant’s right to arbitrate the claim in a newly-filed case may usefully address several concerns. Already mentioned is the systemic reason: that the Tribunal should not be seen to be under the thumb of a judiciary that has no legitimate authority to supervise or regulate the arbitration. Another reason is that if the injunction is eventually dissolved, the arbitration should proceed as closely as possible as it would have proceeded had the injunction not be issued. The seated Tribunal cannot help but have been influenced, and certainly will be seen to have been influenced, unfavorably to the Boyoctter.  A new Tribunal should in principle have no such disposition, and, of course, if the agreement to arbitrate provides for party-appointees, and the appointees’ participation in selecting the chair, a Tribunal constituted with the full voluntary participation of both parties is desirable. An Award rendered by such a new Tribunal should face a smoother path to enforcement if it must be presented for enforcement in the courts of the same State that provided the injunction. Termination of the proceedings also eliminates the possibility that the fact of the pendency of the arbitration serves some secondary business purpose for the Claimant, making the Tribunal an unwitting facilitator. That is an inevitable by-product when a case is proceeding along a normal course, but is better avoided if the Tribunal cannot accomplish its core mission. Further, the monitoring of the judicial proceedings may affect the Tribunal’s disposition toward the Claimant and its counsel, as the Tribunal makes its own private assessments of the efficacy Claimant’s efforts to have the injunction lifted.

Of course there can be countervailing factors that militate in favor of the Tribunal being more patient in awaiting possible rectification in the enjoining State’s courts. One would be if the Tribunal has worked on the merits at significant cost to the parties before the anti-arbitration injunction is obtained. But it will be more usual that the Boycotting Party will invoke judicial authority early in the case, and that the Tribunal will not invest much time.

* * *

One potential avenue of recourse for the Claimant aggrieved by the Boycott is to seat an anti-suit injunction against the Boycotter. For a reminder that where UK arbitration law applies, a UK court may enjoin foreign litigation that would interfere with the arbitration, seeAntisuit injunctions: No arbitration? No worries” from the International Arbitration Newsletter of DLA Piper, 26 September 2013 (www.dlapiper.com/en/japan/insights/publications/2013/09/antisuit-injunctions-no-arbitration-no-worries).

Query how shall a Tribunal when asked by the enjoined Claimant for a stay of indefinite duration, pending appeals of the illegitimate injunction, take into account that party’s failure at an early stage to have availed itself of this opportunity in a UK court to enjoin the adverse party from pursuing an anti-arbitration injunction?


Query also, if the Tribunal makes a Partial Award in favor of its own jurisdiction, how shall the Tribunal take into account, when asked by the enjoined Claimant for an indefinite stay, the fact that the Claimant undertakes no proceedings for enforcement of that Award?  Is it a satisfactory answer that pursuing a proceeding for enforcement of the Award might motivate the Boycotter to apply for contempt sanctions?


Also, what degree of proof shall a Tribunal require that the enjoined Claimant will be subjected to a contempt sanction if it takes particular steps in the arbitration or related to the arbitration (such as award-enforcement or anti-suit injunction proceedings in a court at the seat)? Shall the Tribunal require some proof as to the severity of the potential sanction, the likelihood of its imposition, and its irreversibility even if the injunction is ultimately declared to have been unlawful? Not to be overlooked in this regard is the possibility for the Tribunal as a provisional measure to direct the Boycotter to refrain from taking contempt proceedings, as was done in the well-known SGS v Pakistan ICSID arbitration. (See E. Gaillard, Reflections on the Use of Anti-Suit Injunctions in International Arbitration, in L. Mistelis & J. Lew eds., Pervasive Problems in International Arbitration, pp. 203 et seq at p. 205 n.6 (2006)). But such an order against a non-State party in commercial arbitration may be toothless unless it can be enforced judicially in a jurisdiction where the Boycotter has assets.