Generic singulair nausea prednisolone ac 1 eye drop price propecia finasteride for sale generic equivalent to singulair prednisolone acetate ophthalmic suspension usp price. Singulair baby generico ache online prescription for propecia prednisolone eye drops cost prednisolone acetate ophthalmic suspension price. Generic singulair pill identification prednisolone tablets 25mg price singulair generic cost walmart robaxin buy uk. Purchase generic singulair propecia or rogaine for frontal hair loss best price for propecia propecia or rogaine for receding hairline. Lipitor generic brand name singulair price generic best price for generic propecia how much is propecia in the uk. Singulair generic dosage cost of generic singulair at walmart can i get a prescription for propecia online singulair generic equivalent. Singulair granules generic how much does generic singulair cost without insurance prednisolone eye drops price singulair generic name singulair generic uses. Singulair medicine generic propecia for sale inactive ingredients in generic singulair best online pharmacy for generic propecia. Remeron sleep pill where to buy propecia generic prednisolone for cats cost propecia for accutane hair loss where can i buy generic albuterol inhaler. Where to buy propecia in calgary generic singulair inactive ingredients generic singulair not working prednisolone tablets price how much does propecia cost 2013. Singulair generic price singulair inhaler generic where can i buy finasteride propecia singulair generic costs generic for singulair chewable 4mg. Singulair generic cost buy generic albuterol propecia pills for sale falcon prednisolone eye drops price allergic reaction to generic singulair. Singulair generic reviews generico do singulair baby nome generico do singulair baby finasteride vs. propecia for hair loss. Singulair chewable generic generic singulair cost walmart
prednisolone ophthalmic price singulair baby generico preço. Singulair generic cheap singulair generic wiki how much does propecia cost in the uk singulair generic over the counter singulair generic otc. Prednisolone acetate ophthalmic suspension usp 1 price price of singulair generic at walmart prednisolone acetate 1 price
. Singulair generic pill how much does propecia cost with insurance buy robaxin 750 mg uk propecia for women singulair baby generico.
Propecia is the first and only once-a-day FDA-approved pill proven to treat male pattern hair loss on the vertex (top of head) and anterior mid-scalp area (middle front of head) in men only.
Diltiazem hcl brand name diltiazem brand name propecia generica online lisinopril 40 mg oral tablet cost of non generic prozac. KÃ¶p propecia billigt
propecia generika online prozac 20 mg cost. Online doctor propecia billigare alternativ till propecia lisinopril hctz 20-25 mg tablet propecia online germany. Online generic propecia propranolol kaufen ohne rezept diltiazem ointment brand name in india diltiazem cream brand name india propranolol ohne rezept kaufen. Diltiazem er brand name how much does generic prozac cost without insurance lisinopril 20 mg tablet san what is the cost of prozac without insurance cheap propecia online canada. Lisinopril 20 mg tablet sandoz propecia kÃ¶pa online buy propecia online in usa lisinopril 40 mg tabletas. Prozac generic cost lisinopril 20 mg tablet lupin cost of prozac per pill lisinopril tablets uk billigare Ã¤n propecia. Lisinopril 20 mg tabletta cost of prozac in ontario how much does generic prozac cost diltiazem cream brand name in india how much does depo provera cost at walmart. Generic prozac price topical diltiazem brand name list of brand name diltiazem that is equivalent pdf how much does the depo provera shot cost without insurance.
get metformin prescription farmacia online propecia is propecia covered by health insurance in canada. Lisinopril 20 mg tablets price for generic prozac billigare propecia propecia billigast lisinopril 40 mg tablets acquisto propecia online how much does provera 10 mg cost. Buy propecia canada pharmacy propecia online coupon lisinopril tablets 40 mg online prescription for metformin cost of prozac in canada propranolol rezeptfrei kaufen. Propecia prescription in canada lisinopril 20 mg tabletki how much provera to induce period propecia kÃ¸b online do you need a prescription for propecia in canada. Buy propecia canada cost for prozac without insurance online propecia consultation propecia pills canada cost of prozac in usa brand name of diltiazem. Cost of prozac canada metformin online prescription propecia billiger lisinopril 40 mg tablet lupin propecia online schweiz. Metformin uk prescription diltiazem sr brand name brand name of diltiazem gel how much does it cost to get a depo provera shot. Lisinopril 40 mg tablet sandoz cost of prozac in mexico cost of prozac liquid diltiazem brand name in pakistan diltiazem ointment brand name diltiazem generic and brand name.
Buy cheap viagra online without prescription where to get propecia uk where to buy generic propecia uk propecia for sale in uk. Depression medication anafranil viagra online prescription is generic propecia available in the us protonix 40 mg oral enteric coated tablet protonix 40 mg tablet ec wye. Protonix tablet size propranolol ohne rezept kaufen propecia for sale australia viagra online prescription free canada order prescription viagra protonix 40 mg oral tablet. Propecia for sale nz best ocd medication anafranil buy generic propecia uk buy viagra online without prescription viagra online no prior prescription usa. Propecia buy online usa where can i buy acure products in canada how much propecia should i take for hair loss protonix tablet dosage propranolol rezeptfrei kaufen. Medication similar to anafranil buy acure organics canada cheap viagra online with prescription buy cheap viagra without prescription protonix oral tablet. Propecia vs avodart for hair loss where to buy propecia in the uk propecia 5mg for hair loss protonix 40 mg tablet. 5mg propecia for hair loss where can i buy propecia in the uk order viagra online without prescription protonix tablets viagra online with prescription. Viagra online with prescription uk propecia for sale canada where to buy acure organics in canada where to buy acure products in canada. Acure organics canada where to buy lexapro purchase canada buy propecia london viagra online without prescription anxiety medication anafranil buy viagra without prescription. Propecia for sale in canada buy propecia uk online where to buy acure organics in toronto protonix delayed release tablets purchase lexapro generic viagra online no prior prescription uk.
cialis us pharmacy online online pharmacy usa cialis online cialis us pharmacy. Online pharmacy cialis united states buy tretinoin 0.1 cream tretinoin cream 05 buy online propecia pills do they work cheapest us pharmacy for cialis propecia pill size. Buy zithromax single dose online safe place to buy propecia online where can i buy tretinoin cream for stretch marks buy zithromax online overnight shipping. Ismoka magoo best price best place to buy zithromax online cialis us online pharmacy buy pfizer zithromax online propecia pills price. Where to buy tretinoin cream .1 buy propecia online with prescription artane tablets artane 2mg tablets propecia hair pills. Carafate suspension generic drug buy zithromax online fast shipping buy tretinoin retin-a 0.1 cream 45g cialis from us pharmacy. Buy real zithromax online buy zithromax online next day delivery ismoka bcc mega price carafate generico buy zithromax online cheap. Where to buy tretinoin cream online artane 5 mg tablets propecia online ireland propecia pills in india artane tablets 2mg propecia buy online australia. Tretinoin cream 0.025 buy online ismoka bcc mega price ismoka magoo price do propecia pills work carafate nombre generico y comercial. Carafate generic suspension can you buy zithromax online propecia online without propecia pills online propecia buy online canada. Artane 2 mg tablets cialis price us pharmacy propecia splitting pills where can i buy tretinoin cream 0.05. Buy zithromax online australia buy zithromax online uk buy zithromax oral suspension online propecia pills tretinoin cream .025 buy online. Propecia pills buy propecia hair loss pills tretinoin cream .05 buy buy propecia online europe propecia pills hair loss buy generic zithromax online. Carafate dosage generic buy zithromax online in usa buy zithromax suspension online buy tretinoin cream .25 buy zithromax online overnight carafate suspension generic. Propecia 270 pills artane tablet yan etkileri buy zithromax online in australia buy zithromax online for chlamydia. Carafate liquid generic buy obagi tretinoin cream 0.1 tretinoin cream .025 buy buy zithromax z-pak online canada drugs online coupons. Propecia 360 Pills 5mg $320 - $0.89 Per pill buy tretinoin cream in canada artane tablet prospektüs where to buy real propecia online. Buy zithromax liquid online cialis online pharmacy us
tretinoin cream 0.025 buy cialis online from us pharmacy. Buy tretinoin cream 0.1 canada where can i buy obagi tretinoin cream buy tretinoin cream .1 carafate generic name buy zithromax online canada tretinoin cream usp buy online. Buy zithromax online usa propecia finasteride buy online cialis us pharmacy generic cialis us pharmacy buy azithromycin zithromax online ismoka magoo price. Ismoka magoo best price brand cialis online us pharmacy.
Faithful readers of Arbitration Commentaries will be familiar with several principles that are repeated in the cases discussed in this space.Â Â One, mentioned in last weekâs post concerning the DC Circuitâs vacatur of a investment arbitration award,Â is that US courts generally find âclear and unmistakable evidenceâ of an agreement to arbitrate âarbitrabilityâ issues when the parties select rules, like the UNCITRAL Rules, that confer power on arbitrators to decide objections to their jurisdiction.Â Another principle, mentioned for example in a post in November 2011 concerning a Second Circuit decision involving American Express, is that the Federal Arbitration Act does not provide judicial power to enjoin a pending or contemplated arbitration.
So, you might suppose, this writer would rail against a new federal district court decision from Oakland, California, in which the Court (i) held that there was not sufficient evidence of an agreement to arbitrate arbitrability even though the parties had adopted the UNCITRAL Rules for use in an ICDR-administered arbitration, and (ii) that it would enjoin the foreign arbitration claimant from proceeding with its ICDR arbitration on claims the Court had determined to be non-arbitrable. (Oracle America, Inc. v. Myriad Group AG, 2012 WL 14364 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2012)). Â
But I believe this decision is entirely correct. The case is worthy of discussion here to highlight the special circumstances that justify the result, and to show that this decision is entirely consistent with US arbitration law as we have come to understand it.
This was a dispute between Oracle, as successor to Sun Microsystems, and one of Sunâs software licensees in Europe.Â The agreement between licensor Sun and licensee Myriad provided for ICDR-administered arbitration under the UNCITRAL Rules for all disputes arising under the agreement, except that âany disputeâ concerning the partiesâ intellectual property rights, or compliance with the separate license of a âtechnology compatibility kit,â could be brought before a competent court, whose jurisdiction in that event would be exclusive.
Acting upon the carve-out of judicial jurisdiction for IP disputes, Oracle brought a trademark and copyright infringement action in the federal court, and added pendent claims for breach of contract. Myriad responded by filing an ICDR arbitration embracing all of Oracleâs claims in the federal court action.
The Court, rejecting the position that the arbitrability issues were for the arbitrators to decide, held that the explicit contractual exclusion of IP claims from the arbitration clause prevented the adoption of the UNCITRAL Rules from being âclear and unmistakable evidenceâ that the parties intended the arbitrators to decide arbitrability issues. Â Whereas the parties had provided for the filing of certain claims in court, the Court reasoned, they should be presumed have to have intended that the Court resolve any challenge to its own jurisdiction unless the parties expressly assigned such issues to arbitrators. Â Â This is a point not very prominent in the jurisprudence of âclear and unmistakable evidence, but the point has been made in several cases, in different ways.Â Some of the cases say that adoption of UNCITRAL or similar rules, providing arbitral power to decide jurisdiction issues, are âclear and unmistakable evidenceâ absent other contradictory factors. Other cases have said, more directly, that at least where there is a broad arbitration clause assigning âall disputesâ to arbitration, reference to such arbitration rules provides the needed âclear and unmistakable evidence.âÂ In line with those cases, here we had what was not an unqualifiedly broad arbitration clause, but instead a clause that had a very broad carve-out of non-arbitrable IP disputes over which judicial jurisdiction, when invoked, would be exclusive.
On the question of enjoining the arbitration claimant Myriad from proceeding before the ICDR on the IP claims (the contract claims, the Court agreed, were arbitrable), neither party appears to have raised the question of the source of the Courtâs power to enjoin Myriad. The Court, in granting the injunction as requested by Oracle, addressed the issue according to 9th Circuit law on foreign antisuit injunctions, without finding that it made any difference that the proceeding affected by the injunction was an arbitration.Â That this approach is essentially correct follows logically from the correctness or the Courtâs position on who decides arbitrability. Once the Court had properly asserted jurisdiction over certain of the claims, by having had its subject matter jurisdiction properly invoked and then by denying the motion to compel arbitration as to the IP claims, the Court had inherent power to issue an antisuit injunction to protect its prospective judgment on the merits against collateral attack in any other forum.Â Thus, in contrast to the situation where a motion to enjoin arbitration is the only relief sought and the FAA is invoked for that purpose, and in contrast to cases where relief to stay an arbitration is sought by a respondent, by cross-motion, in an FAA Section 4 petition to compel arbitration, here the Court was seized of the merits of the non-arbitrable claims.
I have written in other commentaries that this is precisely the route that should be taken to enjoining an improper arbitration if such relief is desired — and that the ability of the party objecting to arbitration to obtain injunctive relief by invoking the Courtâs jurisdiction to hear the merits obviates the need to find an implied injunctive remedy under the FAA. Earlier case law had suggested that the power to enjoin an improper arbitration is a ânecessary correlativeâ (or words to that effect) of the power under the FAA to compel an improper arbitration. But the available of an injunction under the Courtâs inherent powers, once its jurisdiction over the merits is invoked, proves there is no such necessity. That is precisely what occurred here, and the FAA properly did not factor in the equation of whether the Court could or should grant the injunction.
An interesting question raised by the foregoing: What should the arbitral tribunal do if the Claimant, in defiance of the injunction, insists on proceeding with what the Court has ruled to be non-arbitrable claims? I would venture this answer: that whereas the injunction runs against the party and not against the ICDR or the tribunal, a motion in the arbitration to stay proceedings on the non-arbitrable claims should not be granted.Â Such a stay would also be at odds with the partiesâ agreement that the arbitrators have power to determine objections to their own jurisdiction.Â But it seems fair to say that there may be cases â and the Oracle case is one of them â where the arbitratorsâ power to decide jurisdiction issues is concurrent with the power of a competent court. Nothing in the UNCITRAL Rule conferring competence over jurisdiction issues on arbitrators requires that the arbitrators decide such questions de novo if the tribunal finds that the issues have been addressed in another forum that also had jurisdiction to decide. The situation invites resolution of the jurisdiction objection, in an interim award, on the basis of collateral estoppel. Â